← Retour au blog
tech 29 August 2026

Trump's DHS Uses Obscure Law to Snoop on Journalists and Organizations

The Trump administration used an obscure law to gather private information on journalists and organizations without judicial oversight. The tech community must grasp the implications of such practices on press freedom.

Article inspired by the original source
DHS is using obscure law to snoop on journalists, non-profits, unions ↗ www.theguardian.com

Introduction

The Trump administration, known for its controversial approach to media and organizations, recently drew attention for using an obscure law to obtain private information on journalists, NGOs, and unions. This practice, conducted without court oversight, raises critical questions about privacy protection and press freedom in the United States.

The Obscure Law in Question

The law in question is a little-known part of the United States Code that allows the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to request information from telecommunications companies and social networks without a judicial warrant. This capability was used to obtain six months of phone records for Georgia Fort, a Minneapolis journalist, without her being notified.

Practical Cases and Consequences

Consider the example of Georgia Fort and Don Lemon, two journalists whose YouTube accounts were targeted by search warrants rejected by judges. Although judges denied these requests due to a lack of probable cause, DHS circumvented the judiciary to obtain sensitive information.

Impact on NGOs and Unions

Non-profit organizations and unions are not exempt. These entities, often at the forefront of defending civil rights, also find themselves under surveillance. This strategy could deter these groups from conducting their activities, fearing repercussions.

Reactions and Implications

The reactions to these revelations have been strong. Lawyers and civil liberties advocates point out that these actions set a dangerous precedent. They could encourage other administrations to expand such practices, thus threatening freedom of expression.

Importance for Tech Decision-Makers

Tech companies play a central role in this equation. Their cooperation or resistance can influence the government's access to this data. Decision-makers must weigh the benefits of compliance against the ethical and legal implications.

Conclusion

This case illustrates the need for increased vigilance regarding the use of laws to bypass fundamental rights. As technological innovation progresses, it is crucial to ensure these advances are not used to compromise freedom and privacy.

Let's discuss your project in 15 minutes.

DHS Journalists Privacy Tech Freedom
Deepthix newsletter · 100% AI · every Monday 8am

An AI agent reads tech for you.

Our AI agent scans ~200 sources per week and ships the best articles to your inbox Monday 8am. Free. One click to unsubscribe.

Visit the newsletter page →

Want to automate your operations?

Let's talk about your project in 15 minutes.

Book a call