← Retour au blog
tech 21 July 2026

Flock's Credibility in Question: Repeated Lies to City Councils, Police, and the Public

Flock Safety, an ALPR provider, is under fire for lying about its operations, casting doubt on its reliability with local governments.

Article inspired by the original source
Flock Credibility Lost as It Repeatedly Lies to City Councils, Police, & Public ↗ www.aclu.org

Introduction

In an increasingly surveilled world, trust in security technology providers is crucial. Flock Safety, a company specializing in automatic license plate readers (ALPR), has recently seen its credibility questioned after repeatedly lying to city councils, police departments, and the public. This article explores why Flock lost the trust of local authorities and the implications of these lies for the future of surveillance technology.

The Oshkosh Case: A Telling Example

In April 2026, during a city council meeting in Oshkosh, a suburb of Wisconsin, a decision was to be made regarding the use of Flock Safety's ALPRs. When asked about the system's ability to create heat maps of vehicle movements, Flock's Chief Information Security Officer denied this feature. However, the very next day, it was revealed that Flock had lied. The city council immediately revoked its contract approval, setting a record for the shortest time between approval and cancellation of a Flock contract: one day.

Flock Safety: A Business Model at Risk

Flock Safety later admitted that its ALPR system can indeed generate heat maps, capturing vehicle images for an entire month. Instead of fully addressing its mistake, Flock chose to criticize the city of Oshkosh for not allowing it to explain. This reaction further tarnished the company's reputation.

Implications for Surveillance Technology

Flock's repeated misinformation incidents raise important questions about the reliability and transparency of surveillance technology providers. In a context where more cities are adopting surveillance technologies for public safety reasons, trust is essential. A 2025 study showed that 70% of Americans are concerned about the use of surveillance technology without proper transparency and regulation.

Alternatives and Lessons Learned

Local governments need to reconsider their technology partnerships. Companies like Axon and Vigilant Solutions, which emphasize transparency and compliance with privacy standards, can offer viable alternatives. Moreover, Flock's incident underscores the need for stricter regulation in the surveillance industry to protect citizens' rights. According to a 2026 survey, 65% of American cities are now considering strengthening their guidelines for technology contracts.

Conclusion

Flock Safety's loss of credibility highlights the challenges faced by tech companies in terms of transparency and trust. For decision-makers, choosing partners who uphold these values is crucial. Let's discuss your project in 15 minutes to explore reliable and ethical technology solutions.

CTA

Let's discuss your project in 15 minutes.

Flock Safety ALPR surveillance technology transparency local government
Deepthix newsletter · 100% AI · every Monday 8am

An AI agent reads tech for you.

Our AI agent scans ~200 sources per week and ships the best articles to your inbox Monday 8am. Free. One click to unsubscribe.

Visit the newsletter page →

Want to automate your operations?

Let's talk about your project in 15 minutes.

Book a call