An Alarming Context
In 2026, we witness a wave of legislative proposals across the US, Canada, Europe, and the UK threatening internet freedom. Under the guise of child protection or security, these bills conceal intentions of censorship and surveillance. What differs today is the scale of this movement. It feels like a massively coordinated attack, heavily funded by centralization-enthused entities like Meta, Palantir, or think tanks like the Heritage Foundation.
A Palpable Fatigue
The fight for the Internet appears to lack energy. While organizations like the ACLU, Open Rights Group, and EFF continue to defend digital freedom, public support has waned. In 2012, actions like Wikipedia's blackout against SOPA mobilized millions beyond the tech-savvy circle. Today, such mobilization struggles to reoccur.
Centralization, an Insidious Enemy
Ironically, the Internet, having become more centralized, is more vulnerable than ever to surveillance and control threats. Digital giants concentrate an unprecedented amount of personal data, facilitating the implementation of restrictive measures by governments.
Decentralization as Hope
Initiatives like the fediverse and decentralized social networks represent a glimmer of hope. They demonstrate that a free and open Internet is still possible. However, these solutions remain marginal. For them to gain traction, it is crucial to educate the public about the risks of centralization and the benefits of decentralized technologies.
Resuming the Fight
To revive the fight for the Internet, it is essential to inform and mobilize users. Awareness campaigns must be launched to remind people of the importance of a free Internet. Developers and entrepreneurs must also be at the forefront to propose innovative and secure solutions.
In short, the fight for internet freedom is far from over. It requires constant vigilance and renewed collective action.
Let's discuss your project in 15 minutes.